Legal Opinion

Convention Center Authority v. Anzai

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1995No. 17837PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

In an original proceeding brought by the parties to this court upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 27 of Act 7, 2 1993 Hawaii Session Laws (Spec.Sess.) [hereinafter Act 7], and HRAP Rule 14, 3 the plaintiff Convention Center Authority, State of Hawaii (the Authority) seeks to obtain a determination as to whether the bonds authorized by the 1993 Legislature to build and operate a convention center would be exempt from the constitutional debt limit.

We hold that the one percent increase in the transient accommodations tax (TAT), earmarked in part for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. NakataHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. FieldsHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Pray v. JUDICIAL SELECTION COM'NHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kaho'ohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. JacksonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Save Sunset Beach Coalition v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API