State v. Moriwake
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
The question on appeal is whether an indictment for manslaughter was properly dismissed with prejudice following two hung jury mistrials on the charge. Appellant State of Hawaii (“State”) argues that constitutional principles of double jeopardy posed no bar to further prosecution, and that the trial court abused what the State agrees was the court’s inherent power to preclude further prosecution in such circumstances. While the double jeopardy proscriptions of our federal and state constitutions did not themselves bar continued prosecution, we affirm…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Briones v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Richardson v. Sport Shinko (Waikiki Corp.)Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. QuitogHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.