Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 10, 2005No. 02-0060/MCPublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The lower court found excessive post-trial delay, but declined to grant relief because it determined that the delay did not prejudice Appellant and that the sentence was appropriate. Like the lower court, we conclude that the unexplained post-trial delay in this case was unreasonably lengthy. The key issue before this Court is whether the unreasonable post-trial delay prejudiced Appellant as a matter of law. Appellant’s own declaration and declarations from three officials of a potential employer indicate, with various degrees of certainty,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. Toohey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. Jerry Lee SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. ArriagaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API