Legal Opinion
Brown v. Middaugh
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1999No. 5:96-cv-01097PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment, which plaintiff opposes, as well as plaintiffs cross-motion to supplement his complaint, which defendants oppose. Following oral argument on February 12, 1999, the court reserved decision on these motions. Having examined their merits carefully, the court denies plaintiffs motion to supplement his complaint; grants defendants Middaugh, Meyers, Chappie, Hughes, Lamanto, White and Lisi’s motions for summary judgment; and grants in part and denies in part defendant…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lumhoo v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Stembridge v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Dawson v. County of WestchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- MacK v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.