Legal Opinion
MacK v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2002No. 99CIV8747LTSHBPPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWAIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Mack (“Plaintiff’) alleges that defendants The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port Authority”) and Dr. Scott Bergman (“Dr.Bergman” 1 ) (collectively, “Defendants”) created a hostile work environment and subjected him to disparate treatment in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. He seeks damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for alleged mental distress and economic loss. Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants’ actions constituted intentional…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bush v. Fordham UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Sullivan v. Newburgh Enlarged School District Clarence CooperDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Whaley v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Novak v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Monte v. Ernst & Young LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.