Legal Opinion

Feinstein v. Daniel Reeves, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 2, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, District Judge.

At the close of plaintiffs’ case, with the consent of the attorney for plaintiffs, a motion for dismissal of the first cause of action of the plaintiff Edna Feinstein was. granted.

At the close of the case, the motion made by the defendant Swift & Co., Inc., to dismiss the complaint as against it was granted.

At the close of the case, the defendant Daniel Reeves, Inc., moved for dismissal of the complaint and the direction of a verdict. Decision thereon was reserved. The case was submitted to the jury under stipulation by the parties that any judgment based on the verdict…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nicketta v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  2. Adams v. ScheibSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Zorger v. Hillman'sAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Leonardi v. A. Habermann Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Kobeckis v. BudzkoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API