Adams v. Scheib
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,
These two appeals 1 challenge the propriety of the action of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin Coun ty in (1) granting new trials in each of six assumpsit actions after jury verdicts in favor of the original defendants in each action and (2) in refusing to take off compulsory nonsuits entered, during trial, in each of said actions in favor of the additional defendants and against the original defendant.
Dorothy Adams, George Adams, Raymond Shomper, Doris Neiter, Earl Neiter, Allen Hoke, Florence Daniels, Gerald Daniels and Harold Schreffler…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Keefer v. ByersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Dorsey v. Yoder CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.