Legal Opinion

Zorger v. Hillman's

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,979PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice MoSurelt

Plaintiff alleged that she ate some pork bought at defendant’s store which gave her trichinosis; the jury found the defendant not guilty, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment on the verdict.

The gist of the defense was the testimony of physicians tending to show that plaintiff could not have com tracted trichinosis from this pork.

On the afternoon of September 26, 1931, plaintiff’s mother and father called at defendant’s store in Chicago and purchased a pork loin which was taken home, cut into chops and fried by the mother. Plaintiff says that at about eight o’clock on that same evening she…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wiedeman v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Harris v. Piggly Wiggly Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  4. General Platers Supply Co. v. Charles F. L'Hommedieu & Sons Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  5. Tavani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Nicketta v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Adams v. ScheibSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Vaccarino v. CozzuboCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Golaris v. Jewel Tea Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API