Shannon v. City of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BONEY, C. J„ DIMOND, RABINOWITZ and CONNOR, JJ., and FITZGERALD, Superior Court Judge. RABINOWITZ, Justice.
This is the second time that this matter is before the court. On the first appeal, we held that the superior court erroneously dismissed appellant’s action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 1
In reaching this conclusion, we held that the allegations of appellant Shannon’s complaint to the effect that appellee city of Anchorage was negligent in failing to fulfill its duty of furnishing Jacob’s ladders for the use of appellant stated a claim for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The Admiral PeoplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- James C. Tullis v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Vanderlinden v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williams v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Loof v. SandersAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Nunez v. American SeafoodsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Barber v. New England Fish CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Baker v. WernerAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.