Legal Opinion
Barber v. New England Fish Company
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1973No. 1636PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERWIN, Justice.
Appellant, Ronald Barber, an employee of the New England Fish Company, appel-lee, was injured while performing duties of his employment on or about July 22, 1969. Barber was employed as a longshoreman-stevedore and was injured while aboard ap-pellee’s barge in the navigable waters of the United States. The barge was located at the dock of the Peterson Paint Company. Barber has received workmen’s compensation benefits pursuant to Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Act, equal to or in excess of $1,606.84.
Barber sued New England Fish Company, setting forth a claim of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- State, Department of Public Safety v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.