Legal Opinion
Decker v. U.D. Registry, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2003No. G030094PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
The U.D. Registry, Inc. (UDR), and Harvey A. Saltz appeal from an order denying UDR’s special motions to strike the complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (all further code references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated) and awarding plaintiffs attorney fees pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 425.16. Section 425.16, commonly referred to as the anti-SLAPP statute, 1 provides for a special motion to strike “[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in fiirtherance of the person’s right of petition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hogya v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lam v. NgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Hall v. Time Warner, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Moore v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District v. Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jespersen v. Zubiate-BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.