Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Wipfler v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1910No. Docket No. 165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Jackson; Parkinson, J. Assumpsit by the people of the State of Michigan, for the use and benefit of Lucy Wipfler, against Charles W. Wipfler and the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland on a receiver’s bond. An order overruling a motion to quash the service of process upon defendant company is reviewed by it on writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Lucy Wipfler, a resident of the county of Jackson, brought suit in assumpsit in the circuit court for that county against Charles W. Wipfler and the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a foreign corporation, which is engaged in doing a bonding and surety business in this State. The return of the circuit judge shows that the suit was begun by the filing of a declaration, with rule *96to plead, on March 31, 1910. No service was had upon defendant Charles W. Wipfler. Upon the same day that declaration was filed, a copy thereof, with notice of the rule to plead indorsed thereon, was served upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Haywood v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Smith v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Gray v. Quicksilver Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. DavarnMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Drueke-Lynch Co. v. Michigan Bonding & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People ex rel. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API