Legal Opinion

Gray v. Quicksilver Mining Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 18, 1884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to Quash Service of Subpoena. ■

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

The defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York, working a quicksilver, mine in Santa Clara •county, California. A statute of California, passed in 1872, (St. Gal. 1871-72, p. 826,) requires every corporation created by the laws of .any other state, doing business in this state, “to designate some person residing in the county in which the principal place of business of said ■corporation in this state is, upon whom process may be served, '* * * .and file such designation with the secretary of state. * * * And it shall be lawful to serve on such person so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Railroad Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Wipfler v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API