Legal Opinion

Owens v. Purdy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1923No. 14158PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, .1.

This is a suit to compel specific performance of a written contract to convey the oil, gas, and other mineral interests in certain tracts of land, and for general relief. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the amended petition, and the cause is here on the question whether a cause of action is therein stated. The material facts alleged are:

On November 6, 1920, it having been represented by defendant Purdy that he had and would convey to plaintiff; Owens a valid, merchantable title to the oil, gas, and other mineral interests in and to certain tracts of land, said plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. YountSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Myler v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Smith v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bynum v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Schofield v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. McDaniel v. McCauleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API