Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. McCauley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 20, 1962No. 39515PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This action was commenced by the defendant in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff, to recover from plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, the sum of $2,200.00 retained by defendant as a real estate commission. From a judgment for said amount, the defendant appeals.
The plaintiff was interested in the purchase of a doughnut shop in the City of Tulsa belonging to one Eggers. The building in which such shop was located was owned by one Yadon. The seller and buyer agreed upon a purchase price of $22,-000.00, plus inventory. Before the contract was completed,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Chaney v. ReddinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- City of Tulsa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Owens v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- IN THE MATTER OF M.K.T.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Appeal of TuckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.