Legal Opinion
Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 6, 1953No. 11346_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought a. civil action in the District Court praying for a writ of mandamus against the National Labor Relations Board, its Chairman, “and/or” its General Counsel. The gist of his petition was that he had been discharged by his employer in violation of Section 8 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1 that he had filed charges against his employer, that the Regional Director and thereafter the General Counsel had refused to issue' a complaint, and that the Board had refused ' to overrule the General Counsel or to issue any order in the matter. He prayed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lincourt v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Jacobsen v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- General Drivers, Chauffeurs, and Helpers, Local 886, AFL v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hanna Mining Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.