Legal Opinion
Hanna Mining Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 7, 1965No. 7PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
The present controversy once again brings before the Court the troublesome question of where lies the line between permissible and federally preempted state regulation of union activities.
I
Petitioners (“Hanna”) are four corporations whose integrated fleet of Great Lakes vessels carries cargo in interstate and foreign commerce and is operated by one of the four, the Hanna Mining Company. The respondent District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association (“MEBA”)1 represented the licensed marine engineers in Hanna’s fleet under a collective bargaining agreement *184terminating on July 15,1962.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Local 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Union v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.