Legal Opinion

Manchester Housing Authority v. Reingold

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 8, 1988No. 87-149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiff, the Manchester Housing Authority (hereinafter MHA or housing authority), appeals from a jury verdict awarding the defendants, the Reingolds, damages for property that the housing authority acquired through eminent domain. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The Reingolds owned property consisting of a parcel of land and attached buildings in downtown Manchester. On April 27, 1982, MHA filed a declaration of taking with respect to the property. Following an assessment of damages by the New Hampshire Board of Tax and Land Appeals, both MHA and the Reingolds appealed to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Phillips-Exeter Academy v. ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  2. Fusegni v. Portsmouth Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Bartage, Inc. v. Manchester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westgate Recreation Ass'n v. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. 3M National Advertising Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API