Legal Opinion

Bartage, Inc. v. Manchester Housing Authority

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 29, 1974No. 6648PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The main issue the court is asked to decide is whether evidence of reproduction cost is admissible as an element or circumstance to be considered in arriving at the fair market value of condemned property. This issue as well as defendant’s exceptions to a failure to grant a requested instruction and to the exclusion of evidence of repairs after condemnation were reserved and transferred by Dunfey, J., after a jury trial with a view resulted in a $145,000 verdict for the plaintiff.

Plaintiff owned the Bartage Hotel which was situated on 10,350 square feet of land located on Pine Street in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Phillips-Exeter Academy v. ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  2. Fusegni v. Portsmouth Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paras v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Stevens v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Vickerry Realty Co. Trust v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Manchester Housing Authority v. ReingoldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API