Legal Opinion
State v. 3M National Advertising Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1995No. 93-288PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, 3M National Advertising Company, Inc., appeals an eminent domain decision by the Superior Court (Conboy, J.), reducing the awards of the board of tax and land appeals (BTLA). The defendant argues that the trial court failed to award just compensation *362by: (1) not employing one of three generally recognized methods of appraisal valuation; (2) deducting post-taking, net rent from the. awards; (3) holding that the signs were personal, not real property; and (4) failing to award compensation based on the defendant’s expectation that the ground leases might be renewed. We affirm.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edgcomb Steel of New England, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- United States v. 27,223.21 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Central Expressway Sign AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Rattee v. RatteeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Lamar Corp. v. State Highway Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Western Farmers Electric Cooperative v. EnisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.