Rosenberg v. Burnstein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., granting a motion to vacate an attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
CANTY, J-.
This is an appeal from an order dissolving a writ of attachment. The complaint and affidavit for attachment aver that during all the time therein stated the defendants were partners, and that between September 18, 1893, and November 27, 1893, plaintiffs sold and delivered to them merchandise of the value of $325.28, and that there is yet due therefor the sum of $146.77. The affidavit for attachment further states “that the said defendants and each of them, have assigned, secreted, and disposed of their property with intent to delay and defraud their creditors, and are about to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Oden v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- Williams v. EnsignSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Pennsylvania Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Newell v. WhitwellMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Beigler v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Schoeneman v. SowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Tremont v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.