First National Bank v. Randall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Winona county, Start, J., presiding, vacating a writ of attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court, vacating a writ of attachment against the property of the defendants, J. J. and C. S. Randall. The appellant claims that the defendants had no right to move for the vacation of the attachment, because (1) the time.for answering had expired, and, while *383.an answer bad been made, it was frivolous, and constituted no de.fence; (2) it did not appear that there had been any levy made under •the writ of attachment; and (3) the defendants had made a general statutory assignment of all their property for the benefit…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- King v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Brown v. Minneapolis Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by18 opinions
- Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Olmstead v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- First State Bank v. SchatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Rosenberg v. BurnsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.