Boyd v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

Magdolna Boyd appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Sears Roebuck and Company in her action seeking damages for injuries sustained when she slipped and fell while on property owned by Sears. We affirm.

In reviewing a summary judgment, we must construe the evidence in the manner most favorable to the appellant, and we must resolve all doubts against the appellee. Motes v.Matthews, 497 So.2d 1121, 1123 (Ala. 1986). The evidence, construed in that manner, suggests the following facts:

Ms. Boyd was at a Sears Service Center having work performed on her automobile. She was in a waiting…