Legal Opinion

Hartzog v. Compass Bank

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1996No. 2951341PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Penny Hartzog and her husband, Michael Hartzog, sued Compass Bank, alleging liability for injuries sustained by Penny in a slip and fall accident on the premises of the bank. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Compass Bank. The Hartzogs appeal. This case is before this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975.

In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court must construe the evidence in a manner most favorable to the appellant and must resolve all doubts against the appellee.Motes v. Matthews, 497 So.2d 1121 (Ala. 1986). Reviewed in that manner, the evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Hambright v. First Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. McDonald v. ServproCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Shelton v. Boston Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Boyd v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howard v. Andy's Store for MenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Woodward v. HEALTH CARE AUTH. HUNTSVILLECourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Bud's Outlet v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  4. Douglas v. Devonshire Apartments, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Williams v. Harold L. Martin Distributing Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API