Legal Opinion

Ford v. Bynum Livestock and Com'n Co., Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 27, 1995No. 2940807PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stanley Ford and his wife, Beverly, sued Bynum Livestock and Commission Company, Inc., alleging liability for injuries sustained by Stanley while he was attending a horse auction on Bynum's premises. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Bynum. The Fords appeal. This case is before this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975.

In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court must construe the evidence in a manner most favorable to the appellant and must resolve all doubts against the appellee.Motes v. Matthews, 497 So.2d 1121 (Ala. 1986). Reviewed in that manner, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grider v. GriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Bogue v. R & M GROCERYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Economy Fire and Cas. Co. v. GoarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Terry v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Horne v. Gregerson's Foods, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. GULF SHORES MARINE INDUSTRIES v. EastburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Powell v. Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Simmons v. CarwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API