Ford v. Bynum Livestock and Com'n Co., Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Stanley Ford and his wife, Beverly, sued Bynum Livestock and Commission Company, Inc., alleging liability for injuries sustained by Stanley while he was attending a horse auction on Bynum's premises. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Bynum. The Fords appeal. This case is before this court pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975.
In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court must construe the evidence in a manner most favorable to the appellant and must resolve all doubts against the appellee.Motes v. Matthews, 497 So.2d 1121 (Ala. 1986). Reviewed in that manner, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grider v. GriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Bogue v. R & M GROCERYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Economy Fire and Cas. Co. v. GoarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Terry v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Horne v. Gregerson's Foods, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- GULF SHORES MARINE INDUSTRIES v. EastburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Powell v. Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Simmons v. CarwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.