Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Chicago Great Western Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1925No. 24,652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Action to recover loss sustained on a carload of apples, by reason of a decline in the market, at Kenyon, this state, during the time the same was unreasonably delayed in transit. The cause was tried and submitted to the court for decision. Findings of fact and conclusions were made and filed in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant moved for amended findings, which motion was denied. From the order denying such motion, defendant attempted to appeal.

No extended remarks are necessary in disposing of the matter. We again call attention to the rule that an order, denying a motion for amended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Desaman v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Nikannis Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Rees v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louis F. Dow Co. v. BittnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Farmers State Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API