Louis F. Dow Co. v. Bittner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
In an action for the recovery of money the defendants moved the trial court to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law by adding a clause to one finding, by striking out one paragraph and inserting another in lieu of it, and by striking out a paragraph of the conclusions of law allowing the costs and disbursements attendant upon a recovery. Their motion was denied. They appeal from the order denying it. There was no motion for a new trial. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal.
It has been our consistent holding that an order denying a motion to amend findings by adding to or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank v. TowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Berg v. VeitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Breen v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Julius v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Sullivan v. EbnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.