Legal Opinion

Nash v. Berkmeir

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9036PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellants, as husband and wife, sued the appellee for money alleged to be due the wife as rent for land held under a lease made by her to the appellee for a term of five years, at an annual rental payable on the 1st day of February each' year, it being alleged in one paragraph of the complaint that the lease was by parol, and in another paragraph that it was in writing, and a copy is filed with the paragraph.

To each paragraph the appellee answered that at the time of making the lease the lessor was a married woman, and that her husband did not join inthe making of the contract. Upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Railsback v. WalkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Schmitz v. LaufertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Pearcy v. HenleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hughes v. Gallans, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1874

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Maddox v. YocumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Heal v. Niagara Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. TrapIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Spiro v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API