Legal Opinion

Heal v. Niagara Oil Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1898No. 18,564PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellants sued to enjoin the appellees from operating or attempting to operate for oil or gas upon six several tracts of land. The trial court, by general decree, denied the injunction. Upon the trial appellees expressly disclaimed any interest in four of such tracts, and insisted only upon their right to operate upon two of the tracts, that known as the Schultz land, and that known as the Swan land.

One insistence of appellants is that the decree was wrong as to the four tracts other than those of Schultz and Swan. There was no objection to the form or scope of the decree, and no motion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Venture Oil Co. v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Heller v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
  3. Leeds v. DefreesIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Lackey v. BoruffIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Spiro v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API