Legal Opinion
Maddox v. Yocum
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1944No. 17152PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, J.
This is the second appeal of this case. See Maddox v. Yocum (1941), 109 Ind. App. 416, 31 N. E. (2d) 652. The opinion in the first appeal relates the issues and disposes of alleged error in the overruling of appellant’s demurrer to the complaint. The cause was remanded for a new trial which was held and resulted in a verdict for appellee in the sum of $4650.
There is evidence from which the jury could have found the following facts:
In 1933 appellee, Lawrence Yocum, was a distribuí-, ing agent for the Lincoln Oil Company, and as such agent sold gasoline and oil from a truck to farmers in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Railsback v. WalkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Woodbury Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Maddox v. YocumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Nash v. BerkmeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. DercachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Public Service Company of Indiana, Inc., and Riley Stoker Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Bath Iron Works Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Wolff v. SlusherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- National Advertising Co. v. Wilson Auto Parts, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Lake Station v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.