Legal Opinion
State v. Smart
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 1995No. 12546PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of sale of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 2la-278 (b), of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and of conspiracy to sell a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 21a-278 (b).
On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) his convictions of possession of narcotics with intent to sell and sale of narcotics, both in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), violate his double jeopardy rights, (2) the trial…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. FordeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. OttoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. PatrickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.