Legal Opinion
State v. Forde
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 9, 1999No. AC 17636PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Antonio Forde, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 sale of a narcotic substance by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b) and conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a)2 and 21a-278 (b). The defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly refused to grant his motion for a judgment of acquittal, which he…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. MillanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. JarrettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.