Legal Opinion
Northern Insurance v. National Union Fire Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 5, 1917No. Civ. No. 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
WORKS, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover upon an insurance policy for a loss by fire suffered by plaintiff’s assignor. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and it is from that judgment that the defendant appeals.
The amended complaint alleges that the policy was the California standard form fire insurance policy, that the fire occurred on July 26, 1914, and that proofs of loss were presented to the- appellant on August 8th. It is then alleged,
11 That the defendant., did disclaim any liability whatsoever under its said policy for and on account of the loss incurred” by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Borger v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Borger v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tarrant Land Co. v. Palmetto Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- De Noya v. Fidelity Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Harlow v. American Equitable Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Storm v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946