Legal Opinion
Storm v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 13, 1946No. 5309PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion To'Dismiss and for more definite statement.
As to all of the Plaintiffs, except Elsie Hansen, the Defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that the amount involved is less than the jurisdictional amount of $3,000.00 required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 41.
The Defendant relied upon Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583, 59 S.Ct. 744, 748, 83 L.Ed. 1001, which was a .suit to enjoin the enforcement of the California Caravan Act, exacting a license fee upon certain automobile dealers in a sum less than $3,000.00
I do not think…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- New Orleans Pacific Railway Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Giesecke v. Denver Tramway CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. TiedtkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968