Legal Opinion

Borger v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1916No. Civ. No. 1720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

This cause was before the court upon a former appeal (24 Cal. App. 696, [142 Pac. 115]), wherein the facts of the ease in so far as required for the consideration of that appeal and of the present one are fully set forth. Upon the former appeal the judgment and order were reversed upon the ground that according to the terms of the insurance policy in question relating to the time when the loss should become payable, the action had been prematurely brought. Upon such re versal the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tatum v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Irwin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Borger v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Northern Insurance v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API