Legal Opinion

Coe v. United States ex rel. Remington Rand, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 27, 1936No. 6607PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

The Commissioner of Patents appeals from an order of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia granting appellee’s petition for a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner to enter and consider a certain amendment filed on September 20, 1934 to a pending application for patent of one Lasker, serial No. 681,333, filed December 18, 1923 and assigned to the appellee, Remington Rand, Inc.

It appears that, during the period in which the Lasker application was pending in the Patent Office, eight different official actions were had, in five of which new art was…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gold Seal Company v. WeeksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  2. Gerald Glen Boyden v. Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. Edgerton v. KingslandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API