Legal Opinion

Edgerton v. Kingsland

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 4, 1947No. 9362PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia dismissing the complaint in Civil Action No. 29,179 in which the appellant sought the issuance of a mandatory injunction directing the entry of certain amendments in his patent application Serial No. 685,501.

The system disclosed by the application is one in which repeated flashes of light for viewing moving objects are produced between two main electrodes of a mercury vapor tube. Current for the flashes is supplied by a battery and condenser. The flash occurs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. United States Ex Rel. Roughton v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Dyer v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Sharp v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Stephen Wyden v. Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Stephen Wyden v. Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API