Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 15, 1950No. 10208_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing a complaint brought under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to authorize the issuance of a patent.

Appellants’ machine is a device for spreading and folding layers of cloth or similar material. A carrier travels down a long table, spreading the cloth as it moves. Means are provided for catching and holding the cloth at the end of the table; the carriage device then travels back, spreading a new layer of cloth. In this way, layers of cloth of precise length are built up, the ends being firmly gripped by a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Gold Seal Company v. WeeksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  4. Sutter Products Company v. Pettibone Mulliken CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Jozef Sikora v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API