Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 1, 1944No. 8592PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Associate Justice.

The court below dismissed a complaint ifor a mandatory injunction to require the Commissioner of Patents to enter and consider certain amended claims to a parent application which had been filed in 1938 as a division and continuation in part of an earlier application filed in 1933.

The parent application was finally rejected in 1941, after appellant had presented 88 claims. After that final rejection the appellant submitted the further amendments involved in this case which present 9 new claims, some of which are copied from another application. The purpose of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coe v. United States ex rel. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
  2. Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Rendleman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  4. Stephen Wyden v. Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. Stephen Wyden v. Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API