Legal Opinion

Peck v. City of Modesto

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1960No. Civ. 9826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of respondent city of Modesto in an action brought by appellant to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered as the result of a fall caused by a dangerous and defective condition of a public sidewalk maintained by the city.

The complaint alleged that on May 23, 1957, appellant filed and served a claim for damages upon the respondent city. A copy of the claim is attached to the complaint as an exhibit and by reference incorporated therein. The answer to the complaint denies the allegations of the complaint and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API