Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Meyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1962No. Civ. 20346PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment declaring , his property, located at 914-916-918 Haight Street, San Francisco, to be a public nuisance, enjoining further use of the premises except as three units or three “flats,” and ordering -that the.building thereon be demolished. The judgment further provided for a. 60-day .stay. of. execution- of. the. order of demolition so as to give defendant an opportunity to return the structure to a condition suitable for occupancy as a three-unit or three-"flat” building or, in the alternative, to commence authorized alterations of the premises so as to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API