City & County of San Francisco v. Meyer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment declaring , his property, located at 914-916-918 Haight Street, San Francisco, to be a public nuisance, enjoining further use of the premises except as three units or three “flats,” and ordering -that the.building thereon be demolished. The judgment further provided for a. 60-day .stay. of. execution- of. the. order of demolition so as to give defendant an opportunity to return the structure to a condition suitable for occupancy as a three-unit or three-"flat” building or, in the alternative, to commence authorized alterations of the premises so as to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Los Angeles v. Shpegel-Dimsey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988