Legal Opinion

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE v. EXXONMOBILE OIL CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2016No. 14-AA-1401, 14-AA-1403 & 14-AA-1404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Senior Judge:

^Petitioner District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue (“OTR”) petitions for review of three orders issued by the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) that grant summary judgment to respondents Exxon Mobil Oil Corp., Shell Oil Co., and Hess Corp. (collectively, the “oil companies”) and reverse OTR’s Notices of Proposed Assessment of Tax Deficiency against them. OTR contends that OAH’s grant of summary judgment to the oil companies is premised on the erroneous application of offensive 1 non-mutual collateral estoppel against OTR. In United States v. Mendoza, 464…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aziken v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. MICHAEL POTH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Ass'n of Indep. Sch. of Greater Wash. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Association of Independent Schools of Greater Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API