Jay v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant appeals from judgment denying his counterclaim and from denial of motion for new trial thereon. We affirm.
Plaintiff Sears brought suit upon stated account against defendant. Defendant filed counterclaim against plaintiff and a third party, Hooks. Default was taken against Hooks and judgment entered thereon in favor of defendant. Claim and counterclaim between plaintiff and defendant was tried by the judge without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for its account. Judgment was denied defendant on his counterclaim.
The matter of judgment on plaintiff's claim is not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. John David WoodallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Ex Parte GriffithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. WildmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Vacalis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- St. John v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Ex Parte Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Marks v. TenbrunselSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.