Legal Opinion
Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 29, 1986No. 85-277Published
1Opinion of the Court
507 So.2d 388 (1986)
Charles Dolan HOLT and Dixie Holt
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.
85-277.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
August 29, 1986.
Rehearing Denied May 8, 1987.
Sam E. Loftin, Phenix City, for appellants.
J. Pelham Ferrell of Ferrell & McKoon, Phenix City, for appellee.
ADAMS, Justice.
Charles D. Holt and his wife Dixie Holt appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter "State Farm"), which determined that an automobile insurance policy issued to the Holts did not provide coverage to Dixie Holt…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Di Orio v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Butler v. Bonner & Barnewall, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Rodenkirk ex rel. Deitenbach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Schilling v. StockelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.