Marks v. Tenbrunsel
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I concur with the main opinion insofar as it affirms the trial court's dismissal of David Marks's claims against Dr. Lois H. Pope. However, because I disagree with the main opinion's conclusion that the psychotherapist-patient privilege has been overruled implicitly by § 26-14-9, Ala. Code 1975, which provides immunity for reporters of suspected child abuse, I respectfully dissent as to the affirmance of the dismissal as to Dr. Thomas Tenbrunsel. I also note that because the psychotherapist-patient privilege provides that communications between psychotherapists and their patients are to be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- George Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Fletcher v. Tuscaloosa Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.