Legal Opinion

Holt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1986No. 85-277PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles D. Holt and his wife Dixie Holt appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter "State Farm"), which determined that an automobile insurance policy issued to the Holts did not provide coverage to Dixie Holt while she was driving an automobile owned by her stepmother-in-law. We reverse.

On October 27, 1983, Dixie Holt was involved in an automobile accident while driving a Buick automobile owned by her stepmother-in-law, D.D. Holt. Dixie Holt and the occupants of the other automobile involved in the accident…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Butler v. Bonner & Barnewall, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Rodenkirk ex rel. Deitenbach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Schilling v. StockelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Altiere v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Benavidez v. City of GallupNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Breland v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Cincinnati Ins. Company v. Tuscaloosa Parking Auth.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API