Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Huntington National Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 2008No. 90662PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Sweeney, Administrative Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Margaret C. Nagel, appeals from the trial court’s decision denying class certification in her complaint against defendant-appellee, the Huntington National Bank. Because we conclude that the trial court incorrectly determined the merits of the underlying case when it ruled that Nagel was not a member of the class she was seeking to represent, we reverse the trial court’s decision and remand this case for further proceedings.

{¶ 2} The following facts are undisputed. On May 2, 1995, Nagel secured a personal line of credit with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Painters Supply & Equip. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Pivonka v. Sears, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. Estate of Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Voss v. Quicken Loans, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Blankenship v. CFMOTO Powersports, Inc.Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API