Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. CFMOTO Powersports, Inc.

Clermont County Court of Common Pleas

Decided November 29, 2011No. 2009 CVH 1340Published

1Opinion of the Court

Haddad, Judge.

{¶ 1} This matter came before the court pursuant to a renewed motion to certify the fifth claim as a class-action.

FINDINGS OF FACT

{¶ 2} For purposes of this decision, the court will defer to its previous decision, Blankenship v. CFMOTO Powersports, Inc., 161 Ohio Misc.2d 5, 2011-Ohio-948, 944 N.E.2d 769, for a full statement of the facts.

{¶ 3} In addition to those facts, and in relation to Count Five, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant engaged in false representations and marketing through its website and written warranty. The plaintiff is pursuing this claim in a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schmidt v. Avco Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API