Legal Opinion

Ojalvo v. Board of Trustees

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1984No. 83-1500PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The question before us is whether the Court of Claims abused its discretion in denying certification of a class action pursuant to Civ. R. 23(B)(3). For the reasons set forth below we hold that an abuse of discretion has occurred. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand for class certification.

I

The question of what constitutes an abuse of discretion has been examined by this court in numerous contexts. See, e.g., Rohde v. Farmer (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 82 [52 O.O.2d 376] (with respect to granting of a new trial); Consumers’ Counsel v. Pud. Util. Comm. (1984), 10…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API