Ojalvo v. Board of Trustees
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
The question before us is whether the Court of Claims abused its discretion in denying certification of a class action pursuant to Civ. R. 23(B)(3). For the reasons set forth below we hold that an abuse of discretion has occurred. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand for class certification.
I
The question of what constitutes an abuse of discretion has been examined by this court in numerous contexts. See, e.g., Rohde v. Farmer (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 82 [52 O.O.2d 376] (with respect to granting of a new trial); Consumers’ Counsel v. Pud. Util. Comm. (1984), 10…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.