Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals are before the court upon the several petitions of *815Federal Prescription Service, Inc., and Drivex Company (Employer) and Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America (Union) pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160, seeking review of an order issued against Employer on May 31, 1973, 203 N. L. R. B. No. 145, and upon the National Labor Relations Board’s cross-application to enforce the order.
The Board found in agreement with its trial examiner1 that Employer violated § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act by coercively…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Tiidee Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cambria Clay Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters And Butcher Workmen Of North America, Afl--Cio And Its Local P--1149Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher WorkmenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc., and Drivex Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio, Intervenors. Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974